Three60 Consult Logo

57000 Fine Breach Minimum Employment Standards

Posted on: Jul 24, 2017

This case highlights the heavy consequences and financial implications of knowingly breaching minimum employment standards.

BBS is a horticultural company which contracts services to horticultural growers, particularly asparagus producers in the Waikato.  Upon a Labour Inspector visit in 2013, it was discovered the employees were not provided with individual employment agreements, there were no time and wage records, no payments being made for annual and public holidays, and serveral of the employees were working in breach of their visitor visa conditions.  BBS were subsequently issed with an Improvement Notice, which was initially complied with.

However, upon a second follow-up audit in 2016, the Labour Inspector found that one employee was working in breach of her visitor visa conditions, there ten other immigrant employees, and all 11 employees had not been given individual employment agreements or completed timesheets.

In this case there were breaches under 7 separate heads, potentially resulting in a maximum penalty for BBS of up to $940,000:

  1. Failure to retain employment agreements for to 16 employees. The maximum penalty is $320,000 (16 x $20,000)
  2. Failure to keep a wage and time record for 16 employees. The maximum penalty is $320,000 (16 x $20,000)
  3. Failure to keep a holiday and leave record for five employees. The maximum penalty is $100,000 (5 x $20,000)
  4. Failure to pay one employee minimum wages. The maximum penalty is $20,000
  5. Failure to pay annual holidays to five employees. The maximum penalty is $100,000 (5 x $20,000)
  6. Failure to pay two employees public holiday pay. The maximum penalty is $40,000 (2 x $20,000)
  7. Failure to provide two employees with an alternative day for working a public holiday (or to pay an alternative day on termination). The maximum penalty is $40,000 (2 x $20,000)

The factors the Court must have in regard to determining the appropriate penalty under s 133A of the Act have been summarised in the recent Employment Court case of Lumsden v SkyCity Management Limited as including:

  • whether the breaches were committed knowingly or calculatedly
  • the duration of the breach
  • the number of people affected adversely and the extent of any departure from the statutory requirements
  • a history of previous breaches may also be relevant

In this case, BBS had previously been subject to an Improvement Notice and had appropriate systems in place. Employers in New Zealand are expected, especially in this case where BBS was made aware of the compliance requirements by a Labour Inspector, to know the minimum legal requirements in respect of their employees and adhere to them. Ignorance of the law is no defence.

The  Authority found that BBS’s failures to maintain correct records in respect of employment agreements, wage and time records and holiday and leave records was deliberate.

Balancing the need to avoid setting the level of penalty at such a level that there would be a significant risk of non-payment by BBS against the public interest to impose a penalty which acts a deterrent to others who may contemplate engaging in such behaviour, the Authority considered in all the circumstances that applying a penalty of $57,120 was appropriate.

To read the full Authority decision click here

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Christmas is coming…

Christmas is coming…

Once Labour Day has been [yes, believe it or not it’s this coming Monday], the next public holidays are at Christmas and New Year. It always feels like employers have to put a bit more thought into Christmas and New Year because: there are four public holidays; this is a time that many businesses have their annual closedown period; many employees take their annual leave; some employees don’t have enough leave to cover this period; some employment agreements have special rates for these public holidays; and, let’s face it, it is a busy busy busy time. In the next few weeks, my colleague, Tasneem Begum, and I will be offering a free webinar for those employers who want a bit more information around those tricky calculations for leave at this time of the year. We will also be able to answer the questions you have and the challenges you face with leave during the Christmas/New Year period. You are not alone with the questions you have – Questions we are often asked at this time of the year are about employing staff to cover the busy Christmas period

Read More
What the heck is going on with pay?

What the heck is going on with pay?

While we are conscious of the impact that inflation is having on wage and salary conversations, there are four other levers that have been, and are being, used to bring about fundamental change and significant uplift to pay in New Zealand. The Government is using these levers to drive increases in pay at various levels in ways that we may not be conscious of. However, when brought together as a single thread, they are having a big impact.

Read More
To Mediate or not to Mediate

To Mediate or not to Mediate

To mediate or not to mediate – that is the question… While William Shakespeare put into verse Hamlet’s soliloquy in endless agonising verse about dire choices with absolutely no chance of a happy ending – it is not so with mediation. Change the name, and the thinking around the word mediation. Let’s start thinking about it and calling it “an opportunity”. That’s really what mediation is; an opportunity for parties in conflict to come together and sort out their problem(s). It doesn’t have to be the only option, but it should be considered as a first step.

Read More
PREV NEXT