Mystery Shopper Deceptive

Posted on: Aug 16, 2013

Section 4(1) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 imposes an absolute duty on the parties to an employment relationship not to mislead or deceive the other.

In McManus v Home Direct Ltd [2013] NZERA Christchurch 98, an employer’s failure to tell an employee, who was dismissed for failing to follow proper sale procedures, that the employer had used a mystery shopper was held to be misleading and deceptive. The employer’s failure to disclose the use of the mystery shopper (not the actual use of a mystery shopper) meant that the employer’s dismissal of the employee was unjustified because it was not the act of a fair and reasonable employer.

 

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Three60 Consult Customised SpeakUp Channel

Three60 Consult Customised SpeakUp Channel

Our team of HR and ER experts collectively have over 250 years’ experience doing the hard yards around anything to do with employment relations and conflict resolution. We often reflect that many of the complicated

Read More
Constructive Dismissal Case

Constructive Dismissal Case

The Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) have found that resignations resulting from concerns of personal safety in the workplace and a failure to address these concerns can result in constructive dismissal, paired with a hefty

Read More
Minimum Entitlement Penalties

Minimum Entitlement Penalties

Well, we are off to an interesting start to 2023, for those of us interested in minimum entitlements legislation. An Employment Court decision has ruled that the owners of four alcohol retail stores are personally

Read More
PREV NEXT