Three60 Consult Logo

Daily Tariff Increases Employment Relations Authority

Posted on: Aug 17, 2016

The Employment Relations Authority has issued a practice note regarding its calculation of costs awards.

Parties to proceedings in the Authority ought always to remember in evaluating their proceedings that if they are unsuccessful, they will almost always face the prospect of having to make a contribution to the costs of the successful party, as well as meeting their own costs.

The Authority has traditionally used a daily tariff approach as a starting point when making costs awards, which until 31 July 2016 was $3,500 per day. For all proceedings filed after 1 August 2016, that tariff will increase now to $4,500 for the first day of hearing and $3,500 for any subsequent days.

What is involved with an award for costs?

  1. Typically the Authority will not deal with costs until the substantive determination has been made and thereafter costs will fall for disposition either by negotiation between the parties or by determination of the Authority.
  2. Parties will always be encouraged to try to resolve costs on their own terms but in the result that costs are not able to be determined by agreement between the parties, the Authority will fix costs on the basis of a timetable that it may set.
  3. Most commonly, the Authority Member will require the successful party to file its claim for costs in the Authority, providing a copy of that document to the other party, and then the other party will have a right of reply on a timetable which the Authority will set.
  4. The daily tariff that the Authority applies gives no more than a guide to the starting point that the Authority will use in calculating the entitlement of the successful party to costs; there may be factors in the particular case which require the Authority to either increase the daily tariff figure or reduce it.
    • For instance, if the behaviour of the successful party created cost that was unnecessarily incurred, then the Authority may reduce the daily tariff amount.
    • Conversely, if the unsuccessful party turned down an operative Calderbank (without prejudice save as to costs) offer then that may encourage the Authority Member to increase the daily tariff proportionately.
  5. Where it is necessary for the Authority to make a decision about costs (that is where the parties are unable to agree costs on their own terms), parties should make clear in their submissions what claim if any they make and the reasons for that position. If they are seeking an award of costs then it is important that that is supported by material such as copies of invoices showing fees and other expenses that have been incurred, the time taken by the practitioner or advocate and the relevant hourly rate.
  6. Costs associated with preparation for and attendance at mediation, whether by agreement of the parties or at the direction of the Authority, are not typically included in costs awards of the Authority.

See: Practice Note 2

 

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Subscribe to Newsletter

One of those weeks: Mental Health Awareness Week 2022

One of those weeks: Mental Health Awareness Week 2022

I have had one of those weeks where I have been in full day mediations virtually every day out of Auckland. What hit me at these mediations is the despair that people find themselves in by the time they arrive at my door. With varying degrees, all of these mediations had people in deep emotional turmoil. Anguish, frustration, anger and deep sadness, to the point where I had to pause to ensure the people were in the right space to make good decisions for themselves.

Read More
To mediate or not to mediate

To mediate or not to mediate

To mediate or not to mediate – that is the question… While William Shakespeare put into verse Hamlet’s soliloquy in endless agonising verse about dire choices with absolutely no chance of a happy ending – it is not so with mediation. Change the name, and the thinking around the word mediation. Let’s start thinking about it and calling it “an opportunity”. That’s really what mediation is; an opportunity for parties in conflict to come together and sort out their problem(s). It doesn’t have to be the only option, but it should be considered as a first step.

Read More
“Summary Dismissal” – what is it and when can it be used?

“Summary Dismissal” – what is it and when can it be used?

“You’re fired!” – many would recall these words being repeatedly spat out by a former US president who had once tried his hand at hosting a TV reality show. In that show, the people who failed to perform to the expected levels were unceremoniously given their marching orders there and then. No process, no consideration of their viewpoint or feedback, no ifs or buts …. Just go! But that was only a show, many would say. That does not really happen here in Aotearoa… or does it?

Read More
PREV NEXT