Dismissal Incompatibility

Posted on: Sep 28, 2012

Question: My client B has an employee who B has come to thoroughly dislike. The employee is a black hole of self-pity and misery. B dreads seeing the employee in the morning and has reached the stage where everything the employee does drives B to distraction. The employee’s employment agreement provides for termination of employment on four weeks’ notice. Can B legally dismiss the employee with four weeks’ notice? If not, is there any other action B can take to remedy the matter?

Answer: In this situation, there is very little that B can do lawfully to get rid of the employee.

Dismissal on notice

B cannot legally dismiss the employee with four weeks’ notice despite the provision to that effect in the employee’s employment agreement. B would have to have a good substantive reason to dismiss the employee (and probably has not got one) and would have to follow a fair procedure. If B dismisses this employee with four weeks’ notice without a good substantive reason and without following a fair procedure, B will undoubtedly be faced with a successful personal grievance claim for unjustified dismissal under the Employment Relations Act 2000. Section 103A of that Act sets out the test for the justifiability of a dismissal.

Is there any other action B can take to ameliorate the matter?

It appears that this employee has not failed to perform in any way so B cannot dismiss the employee for poor performance. It is also unlikely that B could claim dismissal of this employee was justifiable on the ground that B and the employee are incompatible. Dismissal for incompatibility will only be justified when the fault is clearly on the side of the employee and the employer has taken all reasonable steps to resolve the problem.

On occasion employers have been held entitled to dismiss employees for incompatibility. However, the Employment Court has made it clear that dismissal of an employee for incompatibility will seldom be justifiable.

 

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Three60 Consult Customised SpeakUp Channel

Three60 Consult Customised SpeakUp Channel

Our team of HR and ER experts collectively have over 250 years’ experience doing the hard yards around anything to do with employment relations and conflict resolution. We often reflect that many of the complicated

Read More
Constructive Dismissal Case

Constructive Dismissal Case

The Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) have found that resignations resulting from concerns of personal safety in the workplace and a failure to address these concerns can result in constructive dismissal, paired with a hefty

Read More
Minimum Entitlement Penalties

Minimum Entitlement Penalties

Well, we are off to an interesting start to 2023, for those of us interested in minimum entitlements legislation. An Employment Court decision has ruled that the owners of four alcohol retail stores are personally

Read More
PREV NEXT