Drug Alcohol Policies

Posted on: Jun 22, 2012

The case law is relatively clear regarding drug and alcohol policies and it’s important that you get all elements right or it won’t be worth the paper it’s written on!

In general, it is legitimate for an employer to introduce a drug and alcohol policy to the workplace, provided that the policy:

a)    Is not inconsistent with an employment agreement; and
b)    Is supported by the need to comply with statutory health and safety obligations; and
c)    Is both lawful and reasonable; and
d)    Does not impose random/suspicionless testing on all employees; and
e)    Is dynamic and has procedures in place for ongoing review as scientific advances are made (such as       less invasive means of testing);
f)    Sets out clearly what the testing protocols will be, who will carry out the testing, and the consequences       of failing a test.

However, there are some important elements that need to be covered by the policy and before one is introduced.  These include:

  • Consultation – It is crucial that the policy is introduced only after consulting as appropriate with employees potentially affected.
  • Random testing The policy cannot require random, suspicionless testing for all employees. Only those in safety-sensitive areas may be subjected to random, suspicionless testing. There is currently no definition of what constitutes “safety sensitive”, however it is for the employer to decide in consultation with the employees/unions in their workplace.
  • Reasonable cause testing – As for testing employees who work outside “safety-sensitive” areas, an employer may only do so if there is “reasonable cause” to do so, ie post accident/incident or reasonable cause to suspect impairment by the observation of symptoms.
  • Pre-employment testing – There are no issues with drug and alcohol testing pre employment.
  • Testing protocols – The policy must set out the testing protocols, who will conduct the testing, and the consequences of failing a test. It is not enough to include generic statements such as “testing will be done by an outside party” or “a positive result will result in disciplinary action”.

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Changes

Changes

After recently assisting clients from different industries with different types of changes to their businesses, in both adding and removing roles or simply changing duties for some employees, I reflected on my own work history and the changes I had experienced over the last 40 years, including reference points at different stages of my life and how they impacted decisions I made or how I viewed change…

Read More
4691

4691

As we find ourselves in yet another level 4 lockdown, I have reflected on my mediations post lockdown this time last year.

Read More
4685

4685

Money, money, money. A concept that both employers and employees can probably agree is one of the most important elements of working and business, and also something that can get stuck in your head, either in a good way or a bad way (similar to an ABBA song). 

Read More
PREV NEXT