Drug Alcohol Policies

Posted on: Jun 22, 2012

The case law is relatively clear regarding drug and alcohol policies and it’s important that you get all elements right or it won’t be worth the paper it’s written on!

In general, it is legitimate for an employer to introduce a drug and alcohol policy to the workplace, provided that the policy:

a)    Is not inconsistent with an employment agreement; and
b)    Is supported by the need to comply with statutory health and safety obligations; and
c)    Is both lawful and reasonable; and
d)    Does not impose random/suspicionless testing on all employees; and
e)    Is dynamic and has procedures in place for ongoing review as scientific advances are made (such as       less invasive means of testing);
f)    Sets out clearly what the testing protocols will be, who will carry out the testing, and the consequences       of failing a test.

However, there are some important elements that need to be covered by the policy and before one is introduced.  These include:

  • Consultation – It is crucial that the policy is introduced only after consulting as appropriate with employees potentially affected.
  • Random testing The policy cannot require random, suspicionless testing for all employees. Only those in safety-sensitive areas may be subjected to random, suspicionless testing. There is currently no definition of what constitutes “safety sensitive”, however it is for the employer to decide in consultation with the employees/unions in their workplace.
  • Reasonable cause testing – As for testing employees who work outside “safety-sensitive” areas, an employer may only do so if there is “reasonable cause” to do so, ie post accident/incident or reasonable cause to suspect impairment by the observation of symptoms.
  • Pre-employment testing – There are no issues with drug and alcohol testing pre employment.
  • Testing protocols – The policy must set out the testing protocols, who will conduct the testing, and the consequences of failing a test. It is not enough to include generic statements such as “testing will be done by an outside party” or “a positive result will result in disciplinary action”.

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Changes

Changes

After recently assisting clients from different industries with different types of changes to their businesses, in both adding and removing roles or simply changing duties for some employees, I reflected on my own work history and the changes I had experienced over the last 40 years, including reference points at different stages of my life and how they impacted decisions I made or how I viewed change…

Read More
Modern Slavery Consultation Paper released

Modern Slavery Consultation Paper released

MBIE has recently released a consultation paper on Modern Slavery and are seeking feedback on a proposed legislative response to modern slavery and worker exploitation, forced labour, and people trafficking. The aim of the legislation is “to achieve freedom, fairness and dignity… and to address modern slavery and worker exploitation, both in New Zealand and internationally.” Submissions for consultation are open until 07 June 2022. Make sure you have your say.

Read More
The Great Merger

The Great Merger

Eight months ago, I joined Three60 Consult just as Auckland went into Lockdown. Like a lot of us, I thought it would be a short, sharp COVID battle and I remember optimistically suggesting to my boss that we push my start date out for a week.  Thank goodness she rejected my offer! Starting a new job in lockdown had its challenges, but returning to the office after an extended period, as many of us have found, presented just as many. It was a full six months after my start date before I finally sat at my desk. Even then, the emergence of Omicron meant the whole team was not able to come together. Rather, we worked in mini team bubbles. Today as I write, eight months have passed since my start date and I’m finally seeing the full team come together on a more regular basis.

Read More
PREV NEXT