Privacy Commission Tougher Privacy Breaches

Posted on: Jun 03, 2015

In a recent decision the Human Rights Review Tribunal ordered telecommunications company, Orcon, to pay $25,000 in damages. This case sends a strong reminder to agencies to check the accuracy of personal information before using it.

The Applicant, Mr Taylor, had a dispute with Orcon over a bill. Before the dispute was resolved, Orcon sent the debt to the collection agency, Baycorp.  Baycorp then listed a payment default on Mr Taylor’s credit report with Veda Advantage.

Mr Taylor’s complaint was regarding whether Orcon’s actions were a breach of principle 8 of the Act. Principle 8 says that agencies must take reasonable steps to make sure information it is uses is “accurate, up to date, complete, relevant and not misleading.”

For an action to be considered an interference with privacy, there must be a breach of a privacy principle, which causes harm to the individual.

Mr Taylor claimed the Orcon default on his credit report caused him harm including:

  • a finance company declined his application for a loan,
  • he was unable to secure rental accommodation (because landlords do not want tenants with a negative credit rating)
  • his family was significantly stressed and embarrassed.

Findings

The Tribunal found that it was enough that the Orcon default had “a real influence” or “more than minimal” influence upon the Applicant’s situation, and it did not have to be the sole or the material cause.

The Tribunal said it was sufficient for Mr Taylor to establish the Orcon’s default was a materially contributing cause leading to the complainant’s harm. This is despite there being other contributing factors.

The Tribunal clearly articulated the need to consider the connection between the harm and the defendant’s action in the broad sense. It was sufficient the Orcon default was considered as a contributing factor by the finance company and the property manager when declining Mr Taylor’s applications. The fact that other adverse information was present on Mr Taylor’s credit file was found to be irrelevant.

Future implications

From now on, the Privacy Commission will be applying the law in the way interpreted by the Tribunal. This means they will be getting tougher on respondents who have breached one of the principles, so watch out!

See Taylor v Orcon Ltd

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Subscribe to Newsletter

Changes

Changes

After recently assisting clients from different industries with different types of changes to their businesses, in both adding and removing roles or simply changing duties for some employees, I reflected on my own work history and the changes I had experienced over the last 40 years, including reference points at different stages of my life and how they impacted decisions I made or how I viewed change…

Read More
Modern Slavery Consultation Paper released

Modern Slavery Consultation Paper released

MBIE has recently released a consultation paper on Modern Slavery and are seeking feedback on a proposed legislative response to modern slavery and worker exploitation, forced labour, and people trafficking. The aim of the legislation is “to achieve freedom, fairness and dignity… and to address modern slavery and worker exploitation, both in New Zealand and internationally.” Submissions for consultation are open until 07 June 2022. Make sure you have your say.

Read More
The Great Merger

The Great Merger

Eight months ago, I joined Three60 Consult just as Auckland went into Lockdown. Like a lot of us, I thought it would be a short, sharp COVID battle and I remember optimistically suggesting to my boss that we push my start date out for a week.  Thank goodness she rejected my offer! Starting a new job in lockdown had its challenges, but returning to the office after an extended period, as many of us have found, presented just as many. It was a full six months after my start date before I finally sat at my desk. Even then, the emergence of Omicron meant the whole team was not able to come together. Rather, we worked in mini team bubbles. Today as I write, eight months have passed since my start date and I’m finally seeing the full team come together on a more regular basis.

Read More
PREV NEXT