True Nature of the Contractor Relationship

White text on a blue background repeating the title of the article

The Coalition Government recently announced a proposal to enhance clarity when determining whether someone is a contractor or an employee. 

The principle of providing certainty to employers, employees, and independent contractors as to how they are classified and the implications arising from their status is sound.

However, what we have seen to date appears too light on detail for such parties to be able to draw firm conclusions and alleviate status anxiety.

The proposed “gateway test” has four requirements: 

  1. There must be a written contract stating the person is a contractor.
  2. The business must not restrict the worker from working for other companies, including competitors.
  3. The business must not require the worker to be available at specific times or for a minimum number of hours or it must allow them to subcontract their work.
  4. The contract must not be liable to be terminated if the worker declines additional tasks beyond the existing agreement.

The scope for unfair treatment Is a source of concern 

While further detail will emerge in time, the gateway test as it stands has the potential for unintended consequences. 

Just as there are opportunistic employees, there are also less scrupulous employers who may use such an approach to avoid the costs of actual employment and exploit workers who have less knowledge about their employment rights. 

The potential for unfair treatment in this area is concerning, especially given the number of examples we already have of other forms of workplace exploitation, amid limited resourcing at MBIE to effectively enforce compliance with legislation.

As with most areas of workplace legislation, the devil and the angels are in the details. The hope is that the proposed legislation will crystalise the intent of these changes to provide clarity and support innovative ways of working, without giving unintended licence to those less scrupulous who seek to take advantage of others for their own benefit.

If you would like advice on ensuring your organisation’s employment policies are in line with current legislation, or HR support around employment agreements, please get in touch.

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

The Risk of Bias in Employment Investigations

The Risk of Bias in Employment Investigations

Bringing over 15 years of experience in Human Resources, Employment Relations, Industrial Relations, and Talent Acquisition across both the public and private sectors in New Zealand, Jordana Leerson has led complex employment matters and advised

Read More
Workplace Attendance – The Productivity Problem Nobody Wants to Talk About

Workplace Attendance – The Productivity Problem Nobody Wants to Talk About

For more than 20 years in employment relations, industrial relations and HR, Adrian Tocker has been called into organisations to help solve workplace problems. Across different industries, ownership structures and workforces, one issue appears more

Read More
The Hawthorne Effect: How Employers Shape Behaviour Before They Manage It

The Hawthorne Effect: How Employers Shape Behaviour Before They Manage It

Campbell Gourlay, Senior Associate at Three60 Consult, explores how leadership behaviour influences workplace culture, employee conduct and psychological safety, and why the attention leaders give to workplace issues can shape outcomes long before formal management processes

Read More
PREV NEXT