True Nature of the Contractor Relationship

White text on a blue background repeating the title of the article

The Coalition Government recently announced a proposal to enhance clarity when determining whether someone is a contractor or an employee. 

The principle of providing certainty to employers, employees, and independent contractors as to how they are classified and the implications arising from their status is sound.

However, what we have seen to date appears too light on detail for such parties to be able to draw firm conclusions and alleviate status anxiety.

The proposed “gateway test” has four requirements: 

  1. There must be a written contract stating the person is a contractor.
  2. The business must not restrict the worker from working for other companies, including competitors.
  3. The business must not require the worker to be available at specific times or for a minimum number of hours or it must allow them to subcontract their work.
  4. The contract must not be liable to be terminated if the worker declines additional tasks beyond the existing agreement.

The scope for unfair treatment Is a source of concern 

While further detail will emerge in time, the gateway test as it stands has the potential for unintended consequences. 

Just as there are opportunistic employees, there are also less scrupulous employers who may use such an approach to avoid the costs of actual employment and exploit workers who have less knowledge about their employment rights. 

The potential for unfair treatment in this area is concerning, especially given the number of examples we already have of other forms of workplace exploitation, amid limited resourcing at MBIE to effectively enforce compliance with legislation.

As with most areas of workplace legislation, the devil and the angels are in the details. The hope is that the proposed legislation will crystalise the intent of these changes to provide clarity and support innovative ways of working, without giving unintended licence to those less scrupulous who seek to take advantage of others for their own benefit.

If you would like advice on ensuring your organisation’s employment policies are in line with current legislation, or HR support around employment agreements, please get in touch.

Disclaimer

This article, and any information contained on our website is necessarily brief and general in nature, and should not be substituted for professional advice. You should always seek professional advice before taking any action in relation to the matters addressed.

Subscribe to Newsletter

30-day rule for new employees to be repealed

30-day rule for new employees to be repealed

The Coalition Government has today announced changes to employment regulations relating to collective agreements, to be included in the Employment Relations Amendment Bill due to be introduced this year. Here, we summarise the changes and

Read More
Collective Bargaining Landscape – March 2025

Collective Bargaining Landscape – March 2025

As 2025 unfolds, collective bargaining in New Zealand is being shaped by economic conditions, legislative changes, and shifting labour market dynamics. The repeal of the Fair Pay Agreements Act, alongside a government keen on tightening

Read More
Employment Relations changes in 2025

Employment Relations changes in 2025

2025 is shaping up to bring significant changes to employment law to in New Zealand. In this update, we summarise the key changes that employers and employees need to be aware of. Increase to the

Read More
PREV NEXT